SUFN Planning Group - October 24, 2022 7:30pm
Attendees:
Manu Tessone
Stuart Richards
Pam Smith
Ernie Ciccotelli
Charlotte MetCalf
Rick Kenny
Jaci Allen
Stephen Gorman
Mary Gorman
Fran Degasta
Judy Pond
Folger Tuggle
Jaan Laaspere
Sara LeBlanc
Jeff Swenson
Meeting Notes
Jeff Swenson outlined focus of the Planning working group:
Review yearly financials and audit
Review monthly expenses and whether financial procedures are being followed
Review yearly budget
Mary Gorman informed us that the Selectboard had voted tonight to separate from Town Manager, Rod Francis
Jeff Swenson described the publicly available finance documents:
FY2021 Audit including Management Letter comments http://norwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/SB-02-23-2022-packet.pdf (pages 45-108)
2021 Annual Report http://norwich.vt.us/applications-reports-ordinances/
Draft FY 2022 financial statements http://norwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/SB-packet-08-10-2022-indexed.pdf (pages 2-8)
Accounts Payable Warrants in Selectboard Packets http://norwich.vt.us/selectboard-packets/
Pam Smith
gave the timeline for Budget Process
Sept 1st – Standard Forms distributed to Dept Heads
Oct 1st – Forms returned to Town Manager with commentary on deviations
Nov 1st – Consolidated form submitted to Selectboard
Jan 19th – Finalized Budget in Town Report
Expressed concern about completion of budget with departure of Town Manager and Finance Director. Department heads have not budget forms or direction about the budget. Can interim finance director (Joyce Hasbrouck from Robert Half) complete?
Group decided that we should offer during the Selectboard meeting this week to assist with budget process (decided against this the following day, when additional announcement was made about the Town Manager)
People willing to help (Pam Smith, Jeff Swenson and Cheryl Lindberg)
Other long-term planning issues (perhaps better discussed in separate working groups):
Stuart Richards and Ernie Ciccotelli raised the question of switching from Town Manager form of government to a Charter Town
This was the previous Norwich form of government. We had a part-time town administrator and the selectboard members work directly with department heads
Norwich has voted twice by large majorities to have a TM form of government. Having a TM means that the SB has much less responsibility and authority. The SB sets policy and the TM implements policy along with hiring and firing all Town employees
Norwich has had a high turnover of Town Managers with none lasting >3 years
A change would require vote by residents and state approval
Allows for recall of selectboard members
Jeff Swenson suggested that the group should compile a list of pros/cons of such a change
UVM VT Institute for Government: Reforming Local Government by Charter https://www.uvm.edu/sites/default/files/Center-for-Rural-Studies/VIG%20Guides/VIG-charter-2020.pdf
Stuart Richards suggested a separate working group to evaluate a change in Norwich classification to a Rural Town
Advantages are for the citizens to vote on Zoning laws and Town Plan, rather than having the Selectboard having approval
This would mean that instead of having 5 individuals approve these important documents, the whole Town would get a chance to weigh in
Manu Tessone questioned if the Marion Cross septic project would have an impact on the current year budget and Stuart Richards described the history of the septic issues. He said that Jeff Goodrich of Pathways Consulting the company is working on proposed solutions.
Stuart Richards and Ernie Ciccotelli described the increase in taxes and housing costs during their long time in Norwich. They described their attempts to create affordable housing.
Pam Smith raised the concern that the property valuation reappraisal is behind budget